Saturday, September 27, 2008

panic?

I thought Thursday night's conversation was interesting, though I had a few qualms with critiquing today's society without providing good reason and exploring all factors. First, I disagree with the idea that life was better at any point. My main argument is that we have no proof that life was better in the 50's, 1800's, pre-renaissance, you name it. A 50 year old might argue that their life was better growing up, more simple, less stressed. I would agree that at least subjectively their life felt more fulfilling at that point, but where I disagree is where you place a subjective experience as a starting point for sociological thought. Absolutely, the post-world war 2 years were great, so wholesome (sarcasm), but were people really free? What was the place of women, of African Americans, of gays and lesbians?

2nd, you could argue that life up until the industrial revolution was pretty drab for most people and you could expect to die early after working hard in the fields. Was the quality of life better? Were people happier? The only "proof" we have is the impressions of writers, artists, and other accounts, but that doesn't necessarily lead me to think that an individual was happier. 

Back to the main point, has the quality of our life lessened because of technology, globalization, and sharing this space with 6.7 billion other beings? I don't think so. Hunger, violence, war still are around, but if you crack open a history book, it's nothing new. There is more and at a bigger scale because there are more of us. Overall, though, more people can read, more people can have an education, more people have access to knowledge through the internet, fine arts and music are no longer only for the elite, and, at least developed countries, we can count on a democracy (i use that term loosely in this case...). 

so is my quality of life, is society today better, yes. More people are getting basic needs met thanks to advances in technology, transportation, etc. I'm never hungry, have (almost) equal rights, and can count on a job. That sounds good to me! But, I would agree, a downside is that we tend to overdo it and replace friends with a BlackBerry, but does everyone? Don't we still hang out with friends, go see movies, spend time with loved ones? I do... 

To summarize, society has always had its good and its bad side. I think it's fair to examine our current society from an objective, global standpoint. There are parts that are in need of major repair, but overall, I think we're better off than we were 500, 100 or 50 years ago, cell or no cell phone.

3 comments:

MT said...

hm. words can mislead. did I come right out and say "better" or "worse?" I might have. What I meant was "different". E.g.,
Living with the elements is different from living with silicone. That is not to say one is better than the other.
Living with beauty is different from living with harshness and ugliness. It is easy to prefer beauty, but, still, it is more accurately a "difference," right?
The core of your post seems to be that we continue to hold dearest that which humans hold dearest and we have added some technological aids and quadrupled our population.

"where I disagree is where you place a subjective experience as a starting point for sociological thought." That is the quandry. How does a human observer get away from a subjective starting place?

Sequence 5 said...

I'm not sure anyone did, but I sensed the tone of the conversation overall being that way. I felt that we were saying that things were better before OVERALL, and blaming technology for it.

I would definitely agree that we have lost touch with nature and it's a shame. though I would disagree that we've come away from beauty completely.

i don't know how you get away from the subjective, at least completely. i think you can move away by studying different cultures, talking to people, weighing in what you think from them ... and discussion!

MT said...

Good thing you made the post, then. Different does not mean better. When we point out a difference, many will automatically think one is 'better'. I will be more careful. Catch me!